That Face ID hack actually validates it as a better biometric

face ID secure
Image credit: studiostoks /

The inevitable hacking of Face ID has been achieved, but the lengths that the hackers had to go to crack the system proves that, for all practical purposes, it is a worthy upgrade from fingerprint recognition.

Vietnamese cyber security firm and Android phone maker, Bkav Corp, has managed to reliably bypass Face ID by creating a 3D mask of the user’s face with special attention being paid to the eyes, nose and mouth. However, it is pretty clear that a huge amount of work went into the creation of this mask. Consider:

  1. It was designed using expert cyber security knowledge and an intricate understanding of how Face ID works. Bkav first demonstrated a bypass of facial recognition on laptops in 2008 and has been a player in the field ever since.
  2. 3D printing, 2D printing and hand-made artistry was used to create the mask indicating just how intricate the process was.
  3. Each mask costs $150 to produce.
  4. It took nine days to crack (even with at least ten years’ experience), and I suspect Bkav was working on this flat out.

Bkav’s conclusion is that the fingerprint is still the best method of authentication for an electronic device. However, I think that the intricacy and cost of this hack – combined with the fact that a detailed 3D scan of the user’s face is required – is actually an endorsement of Face ID as a verification system.

Taking this with surveys that suggest that close to 60% of users prefer the system over fingerprint, and the fact that there few reported issues with the reliability and speed of the system, leads me to think that Apple has successfully ticked this box.

It’s also worth noting that fast and reliable Face ID is clearly quite difficult and expensive to achieve (Samsung’s is awful), which leads me to think that Apple has set a standard for high-end devices going forward. I think that this will trickle down through the tiers with time, but it looks like fingerprint sensors may have a limited life span.

Furthermore, Apple now has a clear point of hardware differentiation over its competitors that is likely to last for a generation or two. In the ecosystem, Apple is still miles ahead largely due to Google’s inability to deal with the endemic fragmentation, security and updating issues that continue to hamper the Android user experience.

Hence, I remain unconcerned for Apple’s iPhone gross margins for the next 12 to 18 months.

Be the first to comment

What do you think?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.